According to Hans Madueme, what is the stance of "dogmatic creationism" regarding young-Earth creation?

The choice stating that "there are compelling reasons to believe young-Earth creation is valid" reflects the perspective of dogmatic creationism, which maintains a strong adherence to the belief in a young Earth as described in certain interpretations of religious texts. Proponents of this viewpoint often believe that there is sufficient evidence to support their claims, interpreting scientific data in a way that aligns with their theological beliefs.

This stance does not accept the mainstream scientific consensus regarding the age of the Earth and the evidence that supports a much older geological timeline, such as radiometric dating and fossil records that indicate a long history of life. Instead, dogmatic creationism tends to focus on evidence and arguments that can be seen as supporting their young-Earth creation perspective, reinforcing their belief system. This is what differentiates it from other viewpoints, such as the acknowledgment of the strengths of scientific evidence, which would lead to a different interpretation regarding the age and history of the Earth.