According to Hans Madueme's presentation, which statement about animal death is correct?

The assertion that animal death is not connected to Adam's fall is rooted in a theological perspective that separates the consequences of human sin from the natural order of the animal kingdom. This viewpoint suggests that animal death is part of the created order and the ecological processes inherent in nature, rather than being directly influenced by human sin or the Fall of Adam.

In this context, it is important to note that various theological interpretations exist regarding the relationship between human sin, the Fall, and the state of the world. Some argue that animal death is a natural part of life that existed prior to humans and their transgressions, thus maintaining that the suffering or death of animals is not a theological corollary of Adam's actions.

This understanding aligns with a broader view of creation where animals have their own existence and life cycles independent of human moral failure. Through this lens, animal death is viewed as a situation of ecological necessity rather than a punishment or direct result of human wrongdoing.