What are the two main interpretations about the Nephilim mentioned in Genesis 6?

The interpretation of the Nephilim in Genesis 6 leads to significant discussions among scholars and theologians. The view that they are considered as fallen angels or ungodly men aligns with one prominent interpretation.

In this perspective, "fallen angels" refers to the belief that these beings are a product of the interbreeding between the "sons of God"—often interpreted as angels—and human women, resulting in a hybrid offspring seen as mighty and infamous. This interpretation is supported by various ancient texts and aligns with apocryphal literature that elaborates on these beings and their impact on humanity.

The alternative aspect, referring to "ungodly men," stems from the understanding that the Nephilim could represent men who are deviant or wicked, signifying a line of humanity that has strayed far from divine instruction, leading to moral corruption and societal decay. This view connects to the broader context in Genesis, which emphasizes the deterioration of human behavior before the flood.

In contrast, the other options offer interpretations that lack strong scriptural support or do not align as closely with the traditional readings of the text. Thus, the interpretation that encompasses the duality of fallen angels and ungodly men is the most established and significant within the theological discourse