Which scholarly view, developed in the mid-1800s, regarded the Bible as a compilation with numerous errors?

The view that regards the Bible as a compilation with numerous errors aligns with Historical Criticism. This scholarly approach emerged in the mid-1800s and involves analyzing biblical texts through the lenses of historical context, authorship, and cultural influences. Historical Critics aimed to understand the historical reliability of scripture by examining discrepancies and inconsistencies present in the biblical texts.

This method contrasts with other theological perspectives such as Liberal Theology, which tends to emphasize the ethical teachings of the Bible and often embraces a more progressive interpretation without necessarily focusing on the errors. Contextual Theology, on the other hand, seeks to interpret scripture within specific cultural and social contexts, while Fundamentalism advocates for a literal interpretation of the Bible, emphasizing its inerrancy and divine authority. Thus, Historical Criticism stands out as the method specifically associated with the identification of errors in biblical texts during that era.